While the catering crowd has been nibbling away at the social feed markets, another complimentary group of nibblers has come into play: the mansions, the galleries, the historical houses, farms, barns, and museums. These buildings and their operating boards are all looking for a piece of what used to the hotels' landscape. They all have interesting, unique facilities: gardens, rivers, ballrooms, soaring spaces, intimate salons, and grass terraces with oaks. There are few hotels, with their generic decor -- their airwalls, their lack of furnishings, lack of unique design -- that can compare with what so many of these sites have to offer. These sites are hungry for business and make no mistake about it. Their boards have all identified rentals as a profit center. Each of those rentals is one less event for a hotel.
The result of these two forces is separate but integrated attacks on the local feeder markets for hotel banquet departments.
Menus
Caterers are offering a significantly wider array menu ideas and menu patterns that are more responsive to the sites at which they work and the broader array of clients with whom they can work. They are not stuck with a single bricks and mortar "look" nor do they stick themselves with standard plated menus. Caterers branch out to:
1. Tapas
2. Taster plates
3. Kosher-like
4. Kosher
5. Extensive children's menus
6. Organic
7. Vegetarian
8. The foodscape of "ethnic"
How many more lifestyle markets, how many more economic groups are opened up by menu creation that is niche market driven rather than by the kitchen's comfort zone?
Food Service Styles
Caterers have nimbly followed the lifestyles of their clients and give these lifestyles expression with styles of food, menus, service, and presentation. It is possible to serve a breast of chicken in more ways than one and I hate to tell hotels but there really are more options than just "Plated" or "French". When a caterer is assisting a client and figuring out the psychology of the event, here are the bag of tricks that caterers carry around in their marketing packs:
1. Table d'Hôte or "Family Style" - guaranteed that everyone will have a better time.
2. Russian Style - which is a "self serve" French.
3. French Service.
4. Butlered out buffet - to a "stand-up" event.
5. All the kinds of buffets.
6. Just butlered finger food.
7. Limitless ways of presenting the foods.
8. Disappearing staff.
9. Hovering staff.
10. Cadres of waiters each carrying a service tray or single plate.
11. Tray service from football trays à la hotel.
12. Plated with clôches - presented altogether at one table.
Tables
What is up with those 72 inch rounds with which hotels like to lash themselves?
I would contend that it is only crazed extroverts or devoted Zen monks who could feel comfortable at a 72 inch round. No one ever gets a kick out of being marooned on one of those monsters where isolated loneliness takes on the grimace of desperation. Does that make for an engaging event? No, of course not.
When a guest is coerced into pulling out a chair to sit at one, that guest is looking at a desert of linen and is forced to focus on the centerpiece, the bread, and the "problems" with the food and the service.
A big table is a big failure. Caterers know this and they work with a variety of tables and shapes. They know that intimacy, elbow rubbing intimacy, makes for a better dynamic, an easier flow of conversation, and less stressful isolation. Caterers know that if a 60 inch table has ten seated at it, there is a good dynamic and, if a 48 inch round has eight or six seated at it, there is an even better dynamic. Finally, for the more formal occasions, groups of banquet tables can be placed end to end and set on a moving diagonal with others set at 90 degrees to each other. This format, caterers know will allow for the greatest creation of energy and the greatest ease of conversation. It seems formal but its energy paths are actually exuberant.
Now why was it that hotels are using those 72 inch rounds? Oh, yes, so that the guests have a miserable dinner experience. Hotels, please keep pursuing your innovative sense of style. We love you.
Decor
Caterers have a hard life. They have to schlep all that heavy equipment in and out of all those houses, sites, and tents. The good part of that brute labor is that caterers, unlike hotels, are not stuck with just one "look" - one space configuration.
Because each catering site will have its own unique decor, furniture, plantings, and gardens, there is likely to be a substantially more defined and client responsive visual style than the generic look of most hotel properties - even when they are 5 Star 5 Diamond. This is, in many cases, a real, defined benefit to the clients; they are getting a "look" that most suits them and their event.
Sites/Venues
A hotel cannot change its skin (no, airwalls do not qualify) to suit the client so it must look only for clients whose style and needs are reflected in that one property. Meanwhile, the caterers are taking those same clients to sites that might better reflect those needs and aspirations. It is a tough life in that ballroom.
Tenting
Tenting has become so much more affordable over the last fifteen years that it is a serious contender for the alternative site and the party at home. Caterers know this and aggressively market tenting options. A tent really does say "special event happening here." Tents, too, are nibbling away at the hotel pie.
Web Presence
Take a moment to search on Yahoo. I suggest Yahoo because it will give you a better cross section of the marketplace than Google, allowing the hotels to rank better than will Google. Look for, say, "banquet site st.louis" and you might be surprised to discover that there is no single hotel listed in the first 50. A search for "wedding site st.louis", yields the first hotel at #34 - a Sheraton Four Points.
So who is grabbing that very obvious web space: 3rd party site channels, 3rd party wedding channels, sites and caterers.
All that web space available for the asking and hotels don't bother to ask. What else don't hotels ask of themselves for themselves?